Aa procedure doubled by legal criteria regarding the existence of the reasons justifying the arrest. In conclusion the Court finds that this regulatory deficiency is likely to violate the provisions of art. of the Basic Law in conjunction with art. of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and art. para. of the Constitution because the person subject to the measure of preventive arrest is deprived of liberty outside certain cases and legal procedures established a priori and as long as the norm in question.
Can be interpreted in the absence of any other legal criteria in the sense Country Email List of legitimizing mandatory deprivation of liberty the person subject to the measure cannot benefit from a fair and just process. Leave a reply Your email address will not be published. Mandatory fields are marked with Comment CCR. Give in payment. Unconstitutionality. Commercial law National jurisprudence minutes Luminita Sima March . Decision number . credits . The author of the notification Bucharest District Court Rdui District Court Sinaia District Court Botoani District Court Feteti District Court Cornetu District Court Snnicolau Mare District Court Clrai District Court Trgu Jiu District Court Slobozia District Court Deta District.
Court Bucharest District District Court Bacu District Court Iai District Court Section civil Trgovite District Court Bucharest District Court Bacu District Court Civil Section Rmnicu Vlcea District Court Civil Section Bucharest District Court Braov District Court . The object of the notification exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. paragraph art. art. art. para. art. especially art. para. and art. and of art. of Law no. regarding the payment of immovable property in order to settle the obligations assumed through credits as well as the law as a whole . Reason for notification First of all the bankruptcy law.
